{"id":48169,"date":"2025-09-01T17:30:00","date_gmt":"2025-09-01T15:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/?p=48169"},"modified":"2025-09-29T20:46:27","modified_gmt":"2025-09-29T18:46:27","slug":"norway-procures-frigates-in-great-britain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/norwegen-beschafft-fregatten-in-grossbritannien\/","title":{"rendered":"Norway procures frigates in Great Britain"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4><strong>No strategic German-Norwegian partnership as with the submarines<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p>It had been a topic of conversation on the coast for some time: would the German Navy's goals of planning a successor to the Class 124's air defence capability in the form of the Class 127 be compatible with the Norwegians' plans for a new frigate class? The positive signals from the submarine co-operation, which heralded a new era not only technically but also politically, gave rise to hope. The cooperation is also developing in an exemplary manner on a personal level. People like each other. But that has nothing to do with whether the product fits. And it doesn't for the Norwegians.<\/p>\n<h4><strong>TKMS is not the loser<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p>Norway has examined what is possible from France, Germany, the USA and the UK. It was not to be expected that Spain would be considered again. At the latest since the difficult and expensive procurement of the Fridtjof Nansen class and the settlement with Navantia over the \"Helge Ingstadt\" accident, this would have been impossible to explain to the Norwegian taxpayer. Kiel-based TKMS did not take part in the tender, which is why the statement from TKMS is not very excited: \"With the current construction contract for four 212CD-class submarines, TKMS has a close, trusting and successful cooperation with Norway in the underwater sector. Two further boats are still awaiting a final decision in Norway. In the surface area, TKMS is ready for the procurement of the F127 air defence frigate by the German Navy, among other things. The Bundestag had already set the course for this at the end of 2024,\" said a spokesperson.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_47381\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-47381\" style=\"width: 380px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-47381\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/MFO_Header-20-300x153.jpg\" alt=\"Type ship Type 26 &quot;Glasgow&quot;, Photo: BAE Systems\" width=\"380\" height=\"194\" srcset=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/MFO_Header-20-300x153.jpg 300w, \/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/MFO_Header-20-768x391.jpg 768w, \/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/MFO_Header-20.jpg 840w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 380px) 100vw, 380px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-47381\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Type ship Type 26 \"Glasgow\", Photo: BAE Systems<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4><strong>European Partnership<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p>Norway has now decided in favour of the Type 26. This gives Norway another strategic partner and triggers the largest investment in the country's defence capabilities. The purchase is not the end of the story: Norway and the United Kingdom are planning a binding agreement to cooperate on the acquisition, operation and further development of frigates in order to jointly strengthen security in the far north. Delivery is scheduled to begin in 2030. The United Kingdom pledges industrial co-operation to the value of the purchase, while separate agreements will be negotiated with industrial partners.<\/p>\n<h4><strong>Classic frigate construction despite changes in naval warfare<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p>The Norwegian Type 26 variants are specially equipped for anti-submarine warfare. That sounds \"classic\", but naval forces will be confronted with drone weapon systems in the future - including underwater. Opponents can dominate through mass and cost-benefit advantage. The associated fundamental reassessment of defence strategies in NATO, particularly in the maritime sector, has not yet been reflected here. We are curious to see how this will also be conceptualised for attack operations, as this is the first new frigate class in NATO to be planned based on the findings from the Black Sea.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Keine strategische deutsch-norwegische Partnerschaft wie bei den U-Booten Es war schon l\u00e4nger Gespr\u00e4chsstoff an der K\u00fcste: Werden sich die Ziele der Deutschen Marine, mit der Klasse 127 einen Nachfolger f\u00fcr die Luftabwehrf\u00e4higkeit der Klasse 124 zu planen, mit den Vorhaben der Norweger f\u00fcr eine neue Fregattenklasse vereinbaren lassen? Die positiven Signale aus der U-Boot Zusammenarbeit, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":48183,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_oasis_is_in_workflow":0,"_oasis_original":0,"_oasis_task_priority":"2normal","footnotes":""},"categories":[486,45,42,49],"tags":[115,10090,10461,10462,10463,238,1315,9331,10464,231,10465,685],"class_list":["post-48169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-headlines","category-marinen-aus-aller-welt-news","category-news","category-schiffsbau-news","tag-grossbritannien","tag-hms-glasgow","tag-klasse-127-fregatte","tag-klassischer-seekrieg","tag-luftabwehrfaehigkeit","tag-norwegen","tag-partnerschaft","tag-ruestungskooperation","tag-seekrieg-21-jahrhundert","tag-tkms","tag-type-26-city-klasse","tag-u-boote-212cd"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48169"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48941,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48169\/revisions\/48941"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}