{"id":6273,"date":"2020-12-11T13:35:44","date_gmt":"2020-12-11T12:35:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/?p=6273"},"modified":"2020-12-12T14:57:56","modified_gmt":"2020-12-12T13:57:56","slug":"china-170-days-at-sea-without-land-contact","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/china-170-seetage-ohne-landkontakt\/","title":{"rendered":"CHINA: 170 days at sea without land contact"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Since December 2008, the <strong>Chinese<\/strong> People's Liberation Navy took part in the international operations to protect shipping in the Gulf of Aden. The last contingent, consisting of the destroyer Taiyuan (Luyang III class, type 052D), the frigate Jingzhou (Jiangkai II, type 054A) and the supply ship Chaohu, returned to its home port of Zhoushan south of Shanghai in mid-October. In the previous six months, the convoy had escorted almost fifty predominantly Chinese cargo ships in the crisis region, travelling 100,000 nautical miles as a trio. Since leaving Zhoushan at the end of April this year, the three ships are said to have had no land contact whatsoever to avoid any possibility of infection: 170 days at sea! Not only for the <strong>Chinese navy<\/strong> a record effort.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Seit Dezember 2008 nimmt die chinesische Volksbefreiungsmarine an den internationalen Operationen zum Schutz der Schifffahrt im Golf von Aden teil. Das letzte Kontingent bestehend aus dem Zerst\u00f6rer Taiyuan (Luyang-III-Klasse, Typ 052D), der Fregatte Jingzhou (Jiangkai II, Typ 054A) und dem Versorger Chaohu kehrte Mitte Oktober in den Heimathafen Zhoushan s\u00fcdlich Schanghai zur\u00fcck. Der Verband hatte [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":6274,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_oasis_is_in_workflow":0,"_oasis_original":0,"_oasis_task_priority":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[45,42,48],"tags":[436,96,433,338,435,78,438,421,434,437],"class_list":["post-6273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-marinen-aus-aller-welt-news","category-news","category-schifffahrt-news","tag-chaohu","tag-china","tag-chinesische-marine","tag-fregatte","tag-jingzhou","tag-marine","tag-schanghai","tag-schifffahrt","tag-taiyuan","tag-zhoushan"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6273"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6273\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6274"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marineforum.online\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}